| поискавой системы для электроныых деталей |
|
CPWR-AN08 датащи(PDF) 4 Page - Cree, Inc |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CPWR-AN08 датащи(HTML) 4 Page - Cree, Inc |
|
4 / 6 page ![]() 4 Application Considerations for SiC MOSFETs January 2011 CPWR-AN08, REV - Application Considerations for SiC MOSFETs - January 2011 This document is provided for informational purposes only and is not a warranty or a specification. For product specifications, please see the data sheets available at www.cree.com/power. For warranty information, please contact Cree Sales at PowerSales@cree.com. ramifications of the modestly higher gate voltage and lower gate charge can be reconciled by using the product of gate charge and gate voltage as a metric of gate energy. The comparison is shown in Figure 4. Even though the operating conditions are not exactly matched, the results of this comparison show that the other devices. Therefore, the higher voltage swing does not adversely affect requirements. The CMF20120D VGS is usually experienced with other gate controlled silicon devices. observed in typical silicon MOSFETs and IGBTs. Once again, this is primarily due the mode transconductance. Gate Charge Comparison Figure 4 A popular figure of merit when comparing Minimization of the figure of merit is an indicator of CMF20120D and the other Si MOSF 32.4 *nC. The figure of merit of the kV part whereas the Si SJMOSFET is rated at only 900 V. 5 ramifications of the modestly higher gate voltage and lower gate charge can be reconciled by using the product of gate charge and gate voltage as a metric of gate energy. The gate charge and gate energy Even though the operating conditions are not exactly matched, the results of this comparison show that the CMF20120D gate energy is comparable to or lower than the the higher voltage swing does not adversely affect gate drive power GS versus gate charge characteristics are somewhat different from what is usually experienced with other gate controlled silicon devices. The Miller plateau is not as flat as observed in typical silicon MOSFETs and IGBTs. Once again, this is primarily due the mode Gate Charge Comparison Gate Energy Comparison Figure 4: Gate charge and energy comparison en comparing MOSFETs is the product of RDS(on) and total gate c of merit is an indicator of the superior part. A comparison between the and the other Si MOSFETs is shown in Figure 5. The Si SJMOSFET has a figure of merit of . The figure of merit of the CMF20120D is 7.12 *nC. Furthermore, the CMF20120D SJMOSFET is rated at only 900 V. 1.75 2.09 2.57 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ramifications of the modestly higher gate voltage and lower gate charge can be reconciled by using the gate charge and gate energy Even though the operating conditions are not exactly matched, the comparable to or lower than the gate drive power versus gate charge characteristics are somewhat different from what is not as flat as observed in typical silicon MOSFETs and IGBTs. Once again, this is primarily due the modest amount of Gate Energy Comparison and total gate charge [6]. A comparison between the as a figure of merit of CMF20120D is a 1.2 2.70 5.44 Figure 5: Qg*RDS(on) Figure of Merit Comparison |
|
|
ссылки URL |
| Вашему бизинису помогли Аллдатащит? [ DONATE ] |
Что такое Аллдатащит | реклама | контакт | Конфиденциальность | Ссылка на техническое описание | обмен ссыками | поиск по производителю All Rights Reserved©Alldatasheet.com |
| Russian : Alldatasheetru.com | Korean : Alldatasheet.co.kr | Spanish : Alldatasheet.es | French : Alldatasheet.fr | Italian : Alldatasheetit.com Portuguese : Alldatasheetpt.com | Polish : Alldatasheet.pl | Vietnamese : Alldatasheet.vn Indian : Alldatasheet.in | Mexican : Alldatasheet.com.mx | British : Alldatasheet.co.uk | New Zealand : Alldatasheet.co.nz |
|
Family Site : ic2ic.com |
icmetro.com |