| поискавой системы для электроныых деталей |
|
TPS2201DF датащи(PDF) 14 Page - Texas Instruments |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TPS2201DF датащи(HTML) 14 Page - Texas Instruments |
|
14 / 23 page ![]() TPS2201, TPS2201Y DUAL-SLOT PC CARD POWER-INTERFACE SWITCHES FOR PARALLEL PCMCIA CONTROLLERS SLVS094B – AUGUST 1994 – REVISED AUGUST 1995 6–14 POST OFFICE BOX 655303 • DALLAS, TEXAS 75265 APPLICATION INFORMATION overview PC Cards were initially introduced as a means to add EEPROM (flash memory) to portable computers with limited on-board memory. The idea of add-in cards quickly took hold: modems, wireless LANs, GPS systems, multimedia, and hard-disk versions were soon available. As the number of PC Card applications grew, the engineering community quickly recognized the need for a standard to ensure compatibility across platforms. To this end, the PCMCIA (Personal Computer Memory Card International Association) was established and was comprised of members from leading computer, software, PC card, and semiconductor manufacturers. One key goal was to realize the concept of plug and play – cards and hosts from different vendors should be compatible and able to communicate with one another transparently. PC Card power specification System compatibility also means power compatibility. The most current set of specifications (PC Card Standard) set forth by the PCMCIA committee states that power is to be transferred between the host and the card through eight of the PC Card connector’s 68 pins. This power interface consists of two VCC, two Vpp, and four ground pins. Multiple VCC and ground pins are used to minimize connector-pin and line resistance. The two Vpp pins were originally specified as separate signals but are commonly tied together in the host to form a single node to minimize voltage losses. Card primary power is supplied through the VCC pins; flash-memory programming and erase voltage is supplied through the Vpp pins. As each pin is rated to 0.5 A, VCC and Vpp can theoretically supply up to 1 A, assuming equal pin resistance and no pin failure. A conservative design would limit current to 500 mA. Some applications, however, require higher VCC currents; disk drives, for example, may need as much as 750-mA peak current to create the initial torque necessary to spin up the platter. Vpp currents, on the other hand, are defined by flash-memory programming requirements, typically under 120 mA. future power trends The 1-A physical-pin current alluded to in the PC Card specification has caused some host-system engineers to believe they are required to deliver 1 A within the voltage tolerance of the card. Future applications, such as RF cards, could use the extra power for their radio transmitters. The 5 W required for these cards will require very robust power supplies and special cooling considerations. The limited number of host sockets that will be able to support them makes the market for these high-powered PC Cards uncertain. The vast majority of the cards require less than 600 mA continuous current and the trend is towards even lower-powered PC Cards that will assure compatibility with a greater number of host systems. Recognizing the need for power derating, an adhoc committee of the PCMCIA is currently working to limit the amount of steady-state dc current to the PC Card to something less than the currently implied 1 A. If a system is designed to support 1 A, then the switch rDS(on), power supply requirements, and PC Card cooling need to be carefully considered. designing around 1-A delivery Delivering 1 A means minimizing voltage (and power) losses across the PC Card power interface, which requires that designers trade off switch resistance and the cost associated with large-die (low rDS(on)) MOSFET transistors. The PC Card standard requires that 5 V ±5%, or 3.3 V ±0.3 V be supplied to the card. The approximate 10% tolerance for the 3.3-V supply makes the 3.3-V rDS(on) less critical than the 5-V switch. A conservative approach is to allow 2% for voltage-regulator tolerance and 1% for etch- and terminal-resistance drops, which leaves 2% (100 mV) voltage drop for the 5-V switch, and at least 6% (198 mV) for the 3.3-V switch. Calculating the rDS(on) necessary to support a 100 mV or 198 mV switch loss, using R = E/I and setting I = 1 A, the 5-V and 3.3-V switches would need to be 100 m Ω and 198 mΩ respectively. One solution would be to pay for a more expensive switch with lower rDS(on). A second, less expensive approach is to increase the headroom of the power supply–for example, to increase the 5-V supply 1.5% or to 5.075 ±2%. Working through the numbers once more, the 2% for the regulator plus 1 % for etch and terminal losses leaves 97% or 4.923 V. The allowable |
|
|
ссылки URL |
| Вашему бизинису помогли Аллдатащит? [ DONATE ] |
Что такое Аллдатащит | реклама | контакт | Конфиденциальность | Ссылка на техническое описание | обмен ссыками | поиск по производителю All Rights Reserved©Alldatasheet.com |
| Russian : Alldatasheetru.com | Korean : Alldatasheet.co.kr | Spanish : Alldatasheet.es | French : Alldatasheet.fr | Italian : Alldatasheetit.com Portuguese : Alldatasheetpt.com | Polish : Alldatasheet.pl | Vietnamese : Alldatasheet.vn Indian : Alldatasheet.in | Mexican : Alldatasheet.com.mx | British : Alldatasheet.co.uk | New Zealand : Alldatasheet.co.nz |
|
Family Site : ic2ic.com |
icmetro.com |